​
Architecture Decision Records (ADRs)

This section documents significant architectural decisions made during the development of Remind Tools.

​
ADR-001: Monorepo Structure

Status: Accepted Date: 2024-01-15

​
Context

Need to manage multiple applications with shared code.

​
Decision

Use Melos for monorepo management with apps/ and packages/ structure.

​
Consequences

  • ✅ Code reuse across applications
  • ✅ Consistent versioning
  • ⚠️ Increased build complexity

​
ADR-002: State Management

Status: Accepted Date: 2024-01-20

​
Context

Need robust state management for complex applications.

​
Decision

Hybrid approach using BLoC for business logic and Riverpod for dependency injection.

​
Consequences

  • ✅ Clear separation of concerns
  • ✅ Testable business logic
  • ⚠️ Learning curve for team

​
ADR-003: Backend Selection

Status: Accepted Date: 2024-01-25

​
Context

Need scalable backend with real-time capabilities.

​
Decision

Use Supabase for backend services.

​
Consequences

  • ✅ Rapid development
  • ✅ Built-in auth and real-time
  • ⚠️ Vendor lock-in risk

​
ADR-004: AI Integration

Status: Accepted Date: 2024-02-01

​
Context

Need AI capabilities for intelligent features.

​
Decision

Integrate Google Gemini Pro for AI features.

​
Consequences

  • ✅ Advanced AI capabilities
  • ✅ Good Flutter integration
  • ⚠️ API costs at scale

​
ADR Template

## ADR-XXX: Title

**Status**: [Proposed | Accepted | Deprecated | Superseded]
**Date**: YYYY-MM-DD

### Context
[Describe the issue or problem]

### Decision
[Describe the decision made]

### Consequences
- ✅ Positive outcomes
- ⚠️ Trade-offs or risks
- ❌ Negative impacts